It can be said that the homes in Europe, without the Russian heating gas, would suffer greatly from the cold and snow. At the forefront of the major losses are global energy supplies, especially oil and gas. It is a war that can theoretically have a winner and a loser but strategically speaking it is a war of losses.Īs Europe and the United States will be affected by the boycott of Russia, financially and economically, to the same extent that Russia will be harmed. The West is still mobilizing to sanction the greatest economic damage on Russia. This time it will be a global economic war. It certainly will not turn into a nuclear war all nuclear powers fear the imbalance of nuclear deterrence, lest the experience of the US nuclear attack on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, which put an end to World War II, be repeated. It will not develop into an all-out war between the West and Russia. Putin saw the expansion of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) in the independent Soviet republics, and the countries of Eastern Europe neighboring his country, as a serious threat to Russia.Ī different Third World War? Yes. It is a system that has nothing in common with the old system except Russia's commitment to what was known as the "Woodrow Wilson Theory", which allows any country the right to block whatever it sees as a threat to its national security. It is completely different from the world order imposed by the West on Russia after the end of World War II.
But it could be a world war of a new kind, which the world has not known before.Ĭertainly, Russian President Vladimir Putin's invasion of Ukraine created unmistakable new facts on the ground: He undoubtedly imposed a new world order. IT will not be a war in the sense of its predecessors, the First and Second World Wars.
0 kommentar(er)
